National Teaching & Learning Sector Network — the open home for connecting university teaching in Australia. Free, independent, open-source. NTLSN, everywhere you work.
Independent · owned by no one · nothing stored, shared or sold.
Our story
NTLSN didn't come from a grant, a committee or a strategic plan. It came from lived experience — the early-career years of finding your way without a map, and wishing someone would reach back and pull you up. NTLSN is that reach-back, at sector scale.
It is built and led by culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) academics. People of colour remain a small minority in academic leadership — and we're not waiting for permission to change that.
Everything here is free, for everyone — for now and for good. No funding paid for it. No grant, no award, no institution owns it. It was made on nights and weekends, on my own time and my own computer.
That's the 2 a.m. reason this exists. If it helps one educator feel less alone in their teaching, it has done its job.
The founder
Associate Professor Seb Dianati
Founder & Chair, NTLSN
Academic developer · Scholarship of Teaching & Learning researcher
Founder of NTLSN and maker of its free tools — the crash courses, induction kits, recognition and Fellowship supports, and the 30+ in-browser toolkits any academic developer can drop into their LMS. Built so that every educator, wherever they work, has what they need.
I build this as a critical scholar of education. My work has traced how open learning — OER, then MOOCs, then microcredentials — and even partnership itself were steadily enclosed and monetised. NTLSN is my attempt at the opposite: to keep the sector's knowledge a free, open commons, and to put what I learned critiquing that system to work repairing it. The paid services exist only to sustain the commons — never to gate it.
— Seb
Author of The Commercialisation of MOOCs; researcher in students-as-partners and Indigenous curriculum; elected (volunteer) board member of the Centre for Australian Democracy. NTLSN grew from that work — a critique of commercialised education, made constructive.
Dianati, S., & Bolt, R. (2025). Embedding Indigenous knowledge in the curriculum: Principles and strategies across the Australian higher education sector. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.55146/ajie.v54i1.1073
Dianati, S., Ashford, T., Pearson, G., & Williams, E. (2025). Evaluating student partnership models in Australian universities. International Journal for Students as Partners, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5909
“Learning is as much emotive, kinaesthetic and in-presence as it is cognitive — arguably more. It happens where you feel heard, seen and felt. That conviction runs through everything NTLSN builds.”
— Seb. And it’s why this exists: decades of sector funding flowed to consultants and restructures while programs flattened and the people who hold learning together were let go. NTLSN is the counter-investment — putting the sector’s knowledge back in the sector’s hands.
The research behind the network
NTLSN wasn’t built on a hunch. It grew out of a decade of published scholarship — on student partnership, Indigenising the curriculum, the flipped and digital classroom, and a book-length critique of what happens when open education is commercialised. Filter by thread:
46
published works
235
citations
6
h-index
107
citations, most-cited paper
the whyThe Commercialisation of Massive Open Online Courses (book) Springer Nature, 2024 — the critique NTLSN answers: what open learning became, and what a free commons could be instead.10 chapters — reading ideologies in MOOCs
MOOC mirage: disrupting illusions of the ‘Golden Age’ of online learning
The Paradox of Progress: dissecting the neoliberal ideologies in edX’s transformation
Piercing the Veil: a critical examination of MOOC ideologies
From OER to MOOCs: an evolutionary analysis and its neoliberal context
Unmasking Ideologies: a critical examination of Coursera from theory to practice
Decoding Ideologies: a Gramscian guide to reading ideologies in MOOCs and beyond
Behind the Screens: unpacking the ideologies of Udacity
Decoding Udemy: a deep dive into the ideological landscape of MOOCs
Beyond research methods: ontology, epistemology, and ideographs
What have MOOCs got to do with good education? (2014 — where the question began)
107 citationsStudent perceptions of technological tools for flipped instruction: Padlet, Kahoot! and Cirrus Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2020 — with Nguyen, Dao, Iwashita & Vasquez
30Reflections of students and staff in a project-led partnership International Journal for Students as Partners, 2020 — with Oberhollenzer
5Embedding Indigenous knowledge in the curriculum: principles and strategies across the Australian higher education sector Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 2025 — with Bolt
3Indigenising the curriculum: benchmarking across the Australian higher education sector HERDSA 2024 — the 39-university audit behind NTLSN’s evidence sections
Innovative partnerships: embedding Indigenous perspectives into curriculum HERDSA 2024
National Reconciliation Week “You can’t ask that” panel The University of Queensland, 2022 — with Walker, Angus & Callope
12Co-designing an equity, diversity and inclusion (un)conference by and for staff and students International Journal for Students as Partners, 2023 — with Hickman
5The many manifestations of successful partnership International Journal for Students as Partners, 2021 — with Cook-Sather et al.
3Students as partners: a critical-digital partnership model for redesigning the language curriculum International Journal for Students as Partners, 2022
Evaluating student partnership models in Australian universities: a benchmarking study International Journal for Students as Partners, 2025 — with Ashford, Pearson & Williams
1Strengthening respect, reciprocity and responsibility through a SaP codesign of an EDI unconference Students as Partners Roundtable, 2023 — with Hickman, Kaur, Ambrose & Arora
Mapping and benchmarking the SaP terrain in Australia Students as Partners Roundtable, 2023 — with Ashford, Williams & Pearson
Student as partners: the missing link in digital curriculum design HERDSA 2023
16Flipped classroom experiences: comparing undergraduate and postgraduate perceptions of self-regulated learning Issues in Educational Research, 2022 — with Iwashita & Vasquez
5Navigating an LMS review process: harnessing next-generation digital learning through evidence-based decision-making Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2024 — with Wade, Searle & Sankey
5Co-designing the first online pharmacy course with the TELAS accreditation standards as a reflective tool Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 2024 — with Pingo & Volk
2Navigating the contradictions of ePortfolio implementation: a practice-based approach through activity theory Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2025 — with Pingo, Sison & Laudari
1Acceptable and unacceptable use of generative AI in higher education: an institutional case study eLearn World Conference on EdTech, 2024 — with Pingo, Laudari, Sankey & Mason
1An introduction to prompting generative AI like ChatGPT for teaching and learning 2023 — with Laudari
1The academic TikTok: academics’ perceptions and uses of Microsoft Flip as a vlogging platform Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2024 — with Spinelli & Sanhueza
2Using assessment submission data to provide timely and contextualised academic support Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 2020 — with Collings
Instructors’ roles in flipped classrooms: action research in a university course Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2024
Beyond the pages: innovative use cases for open texts in vocational education eLearn World Conference on EdTech, 2024 — with Lockley & Lawson
5‘Business as usual’: critical management studies and the case of environmental sustainability education Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 2020 — with Banfield
13Factors that influence translation and interpreting technology adoption by university instructors (TAM) Journal of Translation and Language Studies, 2022 — with Taptamat, Uchiyama & Akagawa
6Rapid response redevelopment: an English-to-Chinese translation course moving online Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 2023 — with Cook, Spinelli & Lai
3Applications of technologies in T&I courses in Australia: perceptions of T&I academics Journal of Translation and Language Studies, 2022 — with Uchiyama & Akagawa
Selected from 46 works · counts per Google Scholar, July 2026 (citation counts change over time) · also convenor/chair, ICCE sub-conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (2023, 2024). Citation of published work does not imply any co-author endorses NTLSN.
The evidence — what the data shows
1,431
Works in the commons
30+
Free in-browser tools
$0
Cost to students & staff
0
Data points stored
Every number here is verifiable in the open: the whole commons is browsable now, nothing is behind a login, and nothing you do is stored, shared or sold.
Steering committee
Dr Kashmira Davé
Co-Chair · CALD lead
University of New England
Youcef Sai
Steering Committee
La Trobe University
Zablon Pingo
Steering Committee
Charles Darwin University
Grant Andrews
Steering Committee
Central Queensland University
A steering committee of colleagues who chose to build this together. Seb Dianati is the founder; the committee guides and grows the commons.
What NTLSN is
A free commons
Every event, resource, framework and recognition pathway across the sector — free, no logins, no paywalls.
We hold nothing
No data is stored, shared or sold. Public information is read in your browser and never leaves it.
Independent & open
Open-source, vendor-neutral and unaffiliated. Owned by no university and no company.
Built by the sector
Made by the people it serves — educators, for educators, across all Australian universities.
Acknowledgement of Country
Acknowledgement of Country
NTLSN acknowledges the Traditional Owners and Custodians of Country throughout Australia, and their enduring connection to land, waters and community. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Sovereignty was never ceded — always was, always will be, Aboriginal land.
Only a Traditional Owner can give a Welcome to Country; anyone can — and should — give an Acknowledgement of Country. First Nations crisis support: 13YARN — 13 92 76.
Independent & unfunded. No funds, no grants, no awards. Affiliations are listed for identification only and do not imply institutional endorsement or sponsorship. NTLSN is independent of all institutions and vendors. · Dianati, S., & Davé, K. (2026). National Teaching & Learning Sector Network (NTLSN) [Independent open educational resource]. https://ntlsn.com · Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.